homotopy category
Let us consider first the category
whose objects
are topological
spaces
with a chosen basepoint
and whose morphisms
are continuous maps
that associate the basepoint of
to the
basepoint of
. The fundamental group of
specifies a functor
, with
being the category of groups
and group homomorphisms, which is called the fundamental group functor.
Next, when one has a suitably defined relation
of homotopy
between morphisms, or maps, in a category
, one can define the homotopy category
as the category whose objects are the same as the objects of
, but with morphisms being defined by the homotopy classes of maps; this is in fact the homotopy category of unbased spaces.
We can further require that homotopies on
map each basepoint to a corresponding basepoint, thus leading to the definition of the homotopy category
of based spaces. Therefore, the fundamental group is a homotopy invariant functor on
, with the meaning that the latter functor factors through a functor
. A homotopy equivalence in
is an isomorphism in
. Thus, based homotopy equivalence induces an isomorphism of fundamental groups.
In the general case when one does not choose a basepoint, a fundamental groupoid
of a topological space
needs to be defined as the category whose objects are the base points of
and whose morphisms
are the equivalence classes of paths from
to
.
- Explicitly, the objects of
are the points of
- morphisms are homotopy classes of paths “rel endpoints” that is
where,
denotes homotopy rel endpoints, and,
- composition
of morphisms is defined via piecing together, or concatenation, of paths.
Therefore, the set of endomorphisms of an object
is precisely the fundamental group
. One can thus construct the groupoid
of homotopy equivalence classes; this construction can be then carried out by utilizing functors from the category
, or its subcategory
,
to the category of groupoids
and groupoid homomorphisms,
. One such functor
which associates to each topological space its fundamental (homotopy) groupoid is appropriately called the
fundamental groupoid functor.
As an important example, one may wish to consider the category of simplicial, or
-complexes and homotopy defined
for
-complexes. Perhaps, the simplest example is that of a one-dimensional
-complex, which is a graph.
As described above, one can define a functor from the category of graphs, Grph, to
and then define the fundamental homotopy groupoids of graphs, hypergraphs, or pseudographs. The case of freely generated graphs (one-dimensional
-complexes) is particularly simple and can be computed with a digital computer
by a finite algorithm
using the finite groupoids associated with such finitely generated
-complexes.
Related to this concept
of homotopy category for unbased topological spaces, one can then prove the approximation theorem for an arbitrary space by considering a functor
and also the construction of an approximation of an arbitrary space
as the
colimit
of a sequence of cellular inclusions of
-complexes
, so that one obtains
.
Furthermore, the homotopy groups
of the
-complex
are the colimits of the homotopy groups of
, and
is a group epimorphism.
-
- 1
-
May, J.P. 1999, A Concise Course in Algebraic Topology., The University of Chicago Press: Chicago
- 2
-
R. Brown and G. Janelidze.(2004). Galois theory and a new homotopy double groupoid of a map of spaces.(2004).
Applied Categorical Structures,12: 63-80. Pdf file in arxiv: math.AT/0208211
Contributors to this entry (in most recent order):
As of this snapshot date, this entry was owned by bci1.